Paper

What Would Leland Stanford Do?

Can microfinance serve two masters- poverty and profits?
Download 20 pages

This editorial commentary argues that Compartamos's initial public offering (IPO) is a warning that microfinance is going awry. The commentary makes the following points in support of its argument:

  • A responsible social investor needs to realize that in microfinance markets the poor people bear all the costs;
  • Microfinance investment decisions should be made with careful due diligence and a realistic understanding of local market conditions;
  • Microfinance institutions (MFIs) should lower the rates for customer-borrowers instead of profiteering on behalf of shareholders or investors;
  • The Compartamos IPO brings into focus a lack of transparency for social investors;
  • Social investors have an obligation to determine if their investments are being repaid with predatory interest rates;
  • MFIs that depend on private market financing will be under pressure to de-emphasize holistic, all-inclusive anti-poverty microfinance programs.

The editorial commentary concludes that:

  • There is more to microfinance than making money
  • There is something unseemly about wealthy individuals and institutions earning excessive returns off the unbearably poor;
  • The Compartamos IPO is a radical departure in core purpose, objective and intention;
  • Microfinance should remain a platform for wiping out the scourge of poverty.

About this Publication

By Lewis, J.
Published